What I find extremely intriguing is the statistics of human
demographics and censuses. I find the area of statistical demographics to be
somewhat controversial now. For example, questions of ethnicity (race), gender, and
sexuality have taken an extreme turn over the past decade. Statistical
Demographics makes me think of Hacking’s theories about the classification of
people. Hacking believes that humans create a classification system that puts people into categories. Hacking suggests that we need these categories to keep order in our world, that like baseball, statistics are necessary to
predict what will happen next because mankind is in fear of the unknown.
Nonetheless, I feel like our classification system of humans
(and therefore our forms of statistic demographics) is becoming blurred. With
the rise of blending categories, such as transgender (or not identifying with a
gender), mix-races, LGBTQ sexualities, cross-cultural identification, and more,
our need for this basic information like gender, sex, or ethnicity is becoming
hard to identify. We cannot organize our populations into rigid categories
anymore; instead we have a more fluid population. I am not sure if now there
are new ways to categorize people, if we invent more categories if it will make
sufficient impact on the data that is collected, or if demographic statistics
need to be modified to fit a certain area. Also, does this factor that we now
can no longer fit people into rigid numbers (or classes) something we should be
afraid of? Or is the grey area of unknown mean that we have progressed as a
society to be adaptable and accepting? Obviously this does not apply
everywhere, but the changing nature of human demographics makes for an
interesting case. And then of course you have the futuristic dystopian
societies that revert back into this idea that in the end, everyone is just a
number and only few can change this.
No comments:
Post a Comment