I agree with Eleni’s opinion that fieldwork exists wherever
and whenever researchers are engaged with or observing the environment with its
people and things. During my time as an anthropology undergrad, one of the
professors told me that research can be found wherever we find something we are
interested in understanding. In my opinion, fieldwork happens when researchers
put themselves in the field, physical or virtual, where the people and things
they want to study exist.
The idea that going out into the field exposes researchers
to situations that challenges their assumptions is something I have experienced
for myself when I carried out my final research project during my undergraduate
studies. However, I do not think fieldwork’s necessarily the antithesis of the
library in terms of where research should be done. Instead, we might have to
consider the history of fieldwork in the social sciences to understand the bad
reputation that doing research in the library, as opposed to the field, has. Within
the field of anthropology, doing research without stepping out onto the field
i.e. researching in the library, developed bad connotations because the late 19th
century – early 20th century anthropologists made conclusions and
theories based on their own imagination without making actual contact with the
people of the cultures they are attempting to study.
The research that I proposed involves looking at how people
interact with information, particularly when information is in abundance. My field will be the platforms on which
these interactions occur and the places where I choose to interact with my
participants. In this case, the field where fieldwork occurs is fluid and is just wherever I choose to put on my Indiana Jones fedora..
No comments:
Post a Comment